Back to Home
AbilityPath Hero
ClientAbilityPath
RoleProduct Designer
Team
Lena Li (PM)Suyang Chen (Eng)
Timeline2025-2026
PlatformWeb App, Website
Project Overview

AbilityPath is a nonprofit supporting over 1,500 individuals and families weekly with developmental disability services. We designed an AI-native intake system to help both families and staff navigate a complex, fragmented enrollment process.

Challenge Details

For families don't know where to start and end up repeating themselves across multiple conversations and systems. For staff, intake triage is largely manual and records are scattered across tools, making it hard to quickly assess whether a case is ready to move forward.

For Families
  • Confusing entry points
  • Repeated questions
  • Long wait times
For Staff
  • Manual screening
  • Re-verification
  • Burnout risk
For Leadership
  • No visibility
  • No performance insight
  • No escalation tracking

The core design challenge was to unify a fragmented intake process into a single system where families get a guided first step and staff can review, complete, and route cases without switching between tools or guessing what's missing.

System Boundaries

AbilityPath operates on a relationship-driven model, not a demand-driven one.

As a nonprofit serving individuals with developmental disabilities, referrals primarily come through trusted networks: regional centers, social workers, schools, and community partners.

Their goal is not to increase volume through advertising, but to ensure appropriate program matching, sustainable enrollment, and high-quality service within established care systems.

What This AI Is Not
  • A demand generation tool
  • A replacement for social workers
  • A public-facing sales funnel
What This AI Is Designed To Do
  • Support existing referral pathways
  • Reduce intake staff burden
  • Improve intake consistency
Target Users

Parents & guardians (ages ~50–70)

Intake & Enrollment Team

Responsibilities
Conversational AI Intake

Designed phone-based AI intake with guided conversation logic and human handoff so families get a clearer first step before reaching staff.

Trust & Safety Logic

Defined escalation rules and data boundaries so the system surfaces readiness signals without exposing raw sensitive records.

Intake Operations Dashboard

Designed a unified workspace for managers to review cases, flag gaps, and route requests across four intake channels.

Workflow & Decision Logic

Translated real intake operations into structured status models and AI copilot logic keeping every final decision with staff.

Research

Define the Problem

Understanding the differing goals, needs, and pain points of families and intake staff to build a balanced system.

I started by understanding how families actually reach AbilityPath today, and what breaks down before intake even begins. This included:

  • 1.How requests arrive across different intake channels
  • 2.What information families typically share first
  • 3.How staff review incomplete records and determine readiness
Intake FlowIntake Review FlowJobs to Be DoneUser Persona

Key Findings

Many caregivers were older and not tech-savvy
Some users face reading or typing barriers
Most families preferred phone calls as their first point of contact rather than forms or email
The intake experience was highly emotional

Other Friction Points

Missing information delays progress
Status is hard to track across tools
Too many cases reach staff too early
Families repeat the same details
Records are fragmented across systems
Accessibility and language barriers remain
AI needs clear escalation boundaries

How Might We

Reframing our insights into specific design opportunities.

01
For Participant

How might we give families a guided, low-pressure first step that helps them understand whether AbilityPath is a fit without asking them to repeat their story or navigate disconnected channels on their own?

02
For Intake Manager

How might we turn fragmented intake records into a unified, structured view that helps intake managers quickly assess case readiness, surface what's missing, and decide next steps without replacing their judgment?

AI Receptionist

Call Logic

Designing the conversational decision tree to ensure accurate routing, secure data collection, and empathetic handling of complex family situations.

Defining Personality and GuardrailsValidating Technical FeasibilityTranslating Logic into the Experience

Handoff & Next Steps

System logic for routing after initial evaluation.

Pass
Show options → get name → SMS summary
Not a fit
Explain why → share resources → SMS
Unsure
Tag for staff review → notify manager → SMS
Existing Client
Route to assigned coordinator → SMS

"Unsure" Escapement Rules

Boundary conditions that trigger staff intervention.

Missing/conflicting answers
Tag Unsure
Avoid guessing
Program criteria changing
Unsure + staff review
Data instability
Support Needs Borderline
Unsure + flag clinical
Needs specialist
Private Pay Questions
Unsure + route finance
Complex billing
Other Design Challenges
How do we build trust with families?What is AI's responsibility?
Intake Operations Dashboard

Review-Ready Intake, with Human Oversight

AI turns scattered intake details into clear next steps, so staff can review cases faster without losing control of the final decision.

The Data ChallengeDefining the AI Decision RulesGrounding Recommendation
Design focus

The challenge was defining what AI should trust, what it should recommend, and when staff judgment should take over.

My role
Frame AI decisionsDefine source priorityAlign decision rulesSet human oversightShape the review experience

Dashboard

A real-time overview of intake volume, case progress, system health, and priority actions, so managers know exactly where to focus without digging through individual cases.

Strategy Impact

Reduced time-to-action by surfacing blockers, integration issues, and review-ready cases in a single view shifting staff from reactive triage to proactive oversight.

Automated Intake
Secure Oversight

Intake Cases

Every intake request from AI phone calls, web forms, manual entry, and synced systems is organized into a structured, actionable view with AI-generated summaries, documentation readiness, and next-step recommendations.

Strategy Impact

Centralized fragmented records across four intake channels into one workspace, reducing repeated data gathering and giving managers a clear path from review to handoff.

Analytics

Workflow analytics that reveal where cases come from, where they get stuck, what information is most often missing, and how intake demand shifts over time.

Strategy Impact

Gave leadership visibility into bottlenecks, backlog trends, and program demand, enabling data-informed staffing and process improvements beyond individual case decisions.

Intake Insights
Custom Logic & Routing Rules

Integrations

A connection status view for every intake source: AI Front Desk, web forms, Magic Case, and OneDrive, showing sync health, error alerts, and records flowing into the platform.

Strategy Impact

Made integration reliability visible to non-technical staff, so intake managers can identify data flow issues before they become case-level problems.

Design Foundations

Design Library

A scalable UI system shaped by design challenges, semantic tokens, and reusable component patterns.

View the full design system
Design Library System
Beta Testing on Going

Results & Outcomes

Automating the initial touchpoint has significantly improved both staff efficiency and the family experience.

Pilot Results (Directional Metrics)

Operational Efficiency

~35% faster case assignment and reduced manual intake review

“Before this, I had to read through a lot of notes and documents. Now I can see the key information immediately.”
— Intake Manager

AI-Assisted Case Review

AI Recommendation Acceptance 45% → 70%

“The AI suggestions give me a clear starting point for reviewing each case.”
— Intake Manager